**Colorado AG Phil Weiser’s “Bipartisan” Election Task Force Has One Goal: Silencing the Woke Vote**
Denver, CO – If you thought the Deep State was just a D.C. swamp creature, you haven’t been paying attention to the Rocky Mountains. Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, a man who looks like he just stepped out of a corporate boardroom for a “diversity, equity, and inclusion” seminar, has been quietly building a new weapon in the war on American sovereignty. He calls it the “Election Security Task Force.” But if you dig past the press releases and the handshakes with local sheriffs, you’ll find a blueprint for a surveillance state that is targeting the very heart of the populist, grassroots movement that made America great in the first place.
Let’s connect the dots that the legacy media won’t. Weiser’s task force, launched in the wake of the 2020 election “turmoil” (read: the moment Americans started asking questions), is being sold as a “bipartisan” effort. But what does “bipartisan” mean in 2024? It means Republicans who have sold their soul to the globalist agenda and Democrats who want to control the narrative. The task force is a classic “problem-reaction-solution” operation. Step one: They manufacture a crisis (voter fraud claims, even though there’s no evidence of widespread fraud). Step two: They create a task force to “solve” it. Step three: They use that task force to crush dissent.
Here’s the kicker: Weiser isn’t just worried about Russian bots or Chinese hackers. He’s worried about *you*. The “disinformation” he’s hunting is the very real, very American skepticism of the system. When you question the integrity of mail-in ballots or the security of Dominion voting machines, you’re not just a citizen exercising your First Amendment rights. To Weiser, you’re a “threat to democracy.” The task force’s secret sauce is a partnership with the feds, including the Department of Justice’s Election Threats Task Force. That’s right, Merrick Garland’s DOJ is now coordinating with state-level enforcers to “monitor” election-related speech.
But the real scandal is the “cybersecurity” angle. Weiser has been pushing for a “uniform” voting system across Colorado, a move that sounds like common sense until you realize it’s a Trojan horse for a centralized, federalized voter database. Think about it: a single system means a single point of failure. It also means a single point of control. If the Deep State wants to manipulate an election, a centralized database is the perfect tool. Weiser is not just securing the vote; he’s centralizing the power to *define* the vote.
And don’t get me started on the “election integrity” grants. Weiser’s office has been funneling taxpayer money to left-wing nonprofits that “train” election workers. What are they teaching them? How to spot “misinformation.” That’s code for “how to flag voters who ask too many questions.” If you show up at a polling place and ask for a paper ballot, you’re now on a list. If you post a video of a suspicious ballot drop box, you’re a “disinformation agent.” This is the same playbook used by the Chinese Communist Party to control their “social credit” system, but in Colorado, it’s wrapped in a flag of “bipartisanship.”
Let’s look at the real “threat” Weiser is hiding. The 2022 Colorado Secretary of State race was a bloodbath for the establishment. The GOP nominee, Pam Anderson, was a RINO who refused to even question the 2020 election. She lost to a Democrat. But the real story was the grassroots movement that got crushed. Weiser’s task force didn’t just target the candidates; it targeted the *ideas*. They went after the “Stop the Steal” rallies with a precision that would make a CIA operative blush. They used the state’s “election security” apparatus to subpoena social media accounts, track license plates, and monitor online chatter. It’s a domestic surveillance program, folks.
And here’s the part that will make your blood boil: Weiser is a key player in the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG). This is the same group that coordinated with Big Tech to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020. Now, they’re using that same playbook to censor election integrity activists. Weiser is the point man for a network of state-level enforcers who are all reading from the same script. They talk about “election security,” but they mean “idea control.”
The mainstream media will tell you Weiser is a moderate, a man of the center. But look at his record. He was a professor at the University of Colorado, a former Obama administration official, and a star litigator for the Justice Department. He is the embodiment of the permanent political class. His entire career is built on maintaining the status quo. And the status quo is a system where the people’s voice is filtered through a corporate-owned media and a two-party system that answers to the same donors.
So, what’s the solution? We need to stay woke. Not to the narrative, but to the machinery. Weiser’s task force is just the latest front in a long war. They want you to believe that the only way to save democracy is to surrender your rights. But the truth is the opposite. The more power they centralize, the more fragile the system becomes. The real election security is a decentralized, transparent system where every vote is counted on paper, by hand, in front of local observers. Anything else is a system designed to be hacked.
The dots are right in front of you. Phil Weiser is not a neutral arbiter of election integrity. He’s a gatekeeper for the Deep State narrative. He’s using the fear of a phantom threat (a stolen election) to install a real one (a stolen right to free speech and fair election oversight). The question is: Are you going to
Final Thoughts
Phil Weiser’s tenure as Colorado’s attorney general reflects a rare, principled balance between aggressive antitrust enforcement and a deep respect for federalism—a tightrope few in his position can walk without falling into partisan noise. His focus on holding Big Tech accountable while protecting consumer privacy and local news ecosystems suggests he understands that the true battleground for democracy isn’t just in Washington, but in the everyday digital lives of his constituents. Ultimately, Weiser’s pragmatic approach may not make the flashiest headlines, but it offers a quietly compelling blueprint for how state attorneys general can become the most effective check on unchecked corporate power in an era of gridlocked federal oversight.