
GTA+ Is Somehow Still A Thing, And Rockstar Is Now Begging You To Subscribe To The World’s Most Mid Gaming Service
Let’s be real for a second. If you told me ten years ago that Rockstar Games—the company that printed money with GTA V and then just left it on the kitchen counter to collect dust for a decade—would be launching a subscription service for their decade-old game, I would have laughed you out of the thread. But here we are, in the year of our lord 2024, and GTA+ is still a thing. Worse than that, the internet is currently having a collective aneurysm because Rockstar just dropped the latest monthly update for this subscription, and it’s somehow even more pathetic than anyone could have imagined.
For the uninitiated—which is probably most of you because who the hell actually pays for this?—GTA+ is Rockstar’s premium subscription service for GTA Online. It costs $5.99 a month. That’s six dollars. For a game that came out in 2013. On a second console generation. I need you to sit with that for a second. You are paying the same price as a Netflix subscription (okay, the cheap one), except instead of getting access to a library of content, you get a handful of in-game currency and some cosmetics that look like they were designed by a committee of NFTs that didn’t sell.
The latest update dropped this week, and the reactions are, predictably, a dumpster fire. According to the official patch notes—which I read so you don’t have to, because I hate myself—GTA+ members this month get: a “free” vehicle (the Declasse Vigero ZX Convertible, which is just a reskinned car from the last update), 200,000 GTA dollars (which is roughly enough to buy a single t-shirt and a moderately priced bag of chips in Los Santos), and access to “The Vinewood Club.” Wow. Hold me back. I’m literally shaking.
Let’s break this down, because I’m a masochist. The Vinewood Club is basically a “premium” version of the in-game car meet that already exists, but with a fancy name. It’s like when your landlord repaints the lobby and calls it a “luxury renovation.” You still have to pay rent, but now the paint smells like desperation. The car is a convertible version of a car that was already in the game. That’s it. It’s the same car, but with the roof cut off. Rockstar literally paid a developer to remove pixels from an existing asset and called it new content. And people are paying for this. We have truly reached peak late-stage capitalism.
But here’s the real kicker, the part that has the GTA community in a full-blown meltdown on Reddit and Twitter (which I will never call X, because that name is dumb). This update also comes with a “bonus” for all GTA+ members: a 50% discount on the new “Mammoth Avenger” customization options. For those of you who don’t speak GTA, the Avenger is a massive flying fortress that costs millions of in-game dollars. The discount is nice, I guess, but it’s like giving someone a coupon for a Ferrari after they already bought the Ferrari. It’s a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist.
And let’s talk about the bigger picture, because this is where it gets spicy. Rockstar is literally begging you to subscribe to a service for a game that is about to be obsolete. GTA VI is coming. We all know it. The trailer dropped, the hype is real, and yet Rockstar is still trying to milk the last drops of GTA V’s wallet like a sad, old dairy cow that hasn’t been milked in a decade. It’s desperate. It’s pathetic. It’s the gaming equivalent of a former celebrity doing a reality show about their life in a suburban mansion.
The AITA of it all? Honestly, if you’re still paying for GTA+ at this point, you might be the asshole. You are actively funding a company that is treating you like a piggy bank. You are rewarding them for releasing the same game twice, then charging you a monthly fee to play it. You are the reason we can’t have nice things. You are the person who buys the “deluxe edition” of a game that comes with a digital keychain and a sad emoji.
But I get it. I understand the sunk cost fallacy. You’ve been playing GTA Online for years. You have the apartment, the yacht, the flying motorcycle that shoots missiles. You’ve invested time and emotional energy into this digital hellscape. So you think, “What’s six more bucks? I’ll get the car and some cash.” That’s exactly what Rockstar wants you to think. They are the devil on your shoulder, but instead of whispering sweet nothings, they’re whispering “please click subscribe, we have bills to pay.”
The worst part? The community is eating it up. I saw a thread on the GTA subreddit where someone was genuinely excited about the “free” 200k. Two hundred thousand GTA dollars. That’s, like, three missions worth of work. That’s the equivalent of getting excited that your landlord gave you a free roll of toilet paper after you paid rent. It’s performative gratitude. It’s Stockholm Syndrome with a controller.
And don’t even get me started on the “exclusive” discounts. Rockstar has mastered the art of making you feel like you’re getting a deal while simultaneously stripping away the base game’s value. Remember when you could just grind missions and buy a car? Now everything is locked behind a paywall or a “member-only” sale. It’s like going to a grocery store where the milk is free, but you have to pay a monthly fee to open the refrigerator door.
The funniest part of this whole circus is that GTA+ doesn’t even include the full game. You still have to
Final Thoughts
Based on the article's breakdown, GTA+ feels less like a revolutionary service and more like a calculated monetization of player impatience, offering marginal conveniences and nostalgic drip-feed content that was once free. While it delivers undeniable value for the most dedicated grinders in GTA Online, for the average player, it’s a subscription to a game that already sells virtual currency; the real takeaway is that Rockstar is simply stress-testing the subscription model for the inevitable, far more expensive ecosystem of GTA VI. Ultimately, you’re paying a monthly fee to skip the very gameplay the developers designed to keep you playing—a pragmatic choice for the wealthy or time-poor, but a cynical one for the rest of us.