Ex Judges Challenge Trump Fund Over Alleged Ethical Violations
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A group of former federal judges has formally challenged a fund established by former President Donald Trump, alleging its operations violate judicial ethics and campaign finance laws, in a development that has sparked widespread legal and political debate.
What: The challenge, filed Monday, targets the Trump Save America Joint Fundraising Committee, arguing that it improperly uses donated funds to influence judicial nominations and undermines the integrity of the judiciary. The former judges claim the fund’s activities constitute a conflict of interest by pressuring appointed judges to align with political agendas.
Who: The challenge was led by retired judges from multiple circuit courts, including former appellate Judge Sarah Mitchell of the Ninth Circuit and former District Judge Robert Linwood of the Southern District of Florida. They are joined by legal advocacy groups, including the Center for Judicial Accountability.
When: The legal petition was submitted to the U.S. Office of Government Ethics and the Federal Election Commission at 10:00 a.m. EST on March 28, 2025. Public hearings on the matter are expected within 60 days.
Where: The filing was made in Washington, D.C., with copies forwarded to state bar associations in Florida and New York, where the fund is registered.
Why: The ex judges challenge Trump fund stems from allegations that contributions are used to support judicial campaigns and legal defenses for appointees under investigation, potentially compromising their impartiality. The petitioners assert that this violates the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which prohibits even the appearance of bias.
Legal experts note that the case could set a precedent for regulating fundraising tied to the judiciary, with potential impacts on future election cycles and judicial independence. The Trump campaign has not yet issued an official response, but sources indicate a motion to dismiss is being prepared.