the supreme court of ohio rules that a glitter bomb lawsuit is not a frivolous case, citing 'irreversible sparkle trauma' and 'emotional distress from relentless cleanup' in a groundbreaking 7-0 decision that has turned glitter into a state-sanctioned weapon of psychological warfare. In a move that has left legal scholars and party planners equally baffled, the court argued that the defendant's use of glitter as 'organic protest confetti' crossed a constitutional line, because 'no human should be forced to find glitter in their car's air vents for eternity.' The plaintiff, a proud minimalist, won emotional damages after proving glitter caused a 'prisoner's dilemma' in their marriage, with their spouse allegedly screaming 'why is there sparkle on my soul?' during a heated argument over vacuuming. Now, Ohio legislators are drafting a bill to require 'glitter hazard warnings' on holiday cards, with one justice ominously noting that 'the war on glitter has just begun.'