**VIRAL NEWS SNIPPET:**

VIRAL NEWS SNIPPET: 🚨 BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules “Yes Means Yes” – Emotional Support Animal Now Required in All Courtrooms 🚨

In a bombshell 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court has declared that all federal judges must now be accompanied by a registered Emotional Support Animal (ESA) during oral arguments. The ruling, stemming from the case Fluffy v. United States, argues that “judicial temperament is enhanced by the presence of a canine or feline companion.” Chief Justice Roberts was reportedly seen with a golden retriever named “Stare Decisis.” Critics claim this is a slippery slope toward paw-stamped dissents. Fake or fact? Let’s clarify.

Reality Check (What’s Real vs. Fake):

• ❌ Fake: The Supreme Court did NOT mandate emotional support animals in courtrooms. The idea of justices with service animals is a satirical meme.
• ✅ Real: The Court did recently hear a case about animal-related regulations (e.g., wild horse management or pet food labeling), but no such “ESA ruling” exists.
• ⚠️ Context: This appears to be a fabricated headline meant to mock perceived judicial overreach or to go viral for laughs. The actual Supreme Court does allow service dogs for individuals with disabilities in very specific, non-public settings, but not as a blanket rule.

Verdict: FAKE – This petition is a hoax. Share responsibly! 🐾🚫