*History Echoes...* the U.S. Supreme Court Just Dropped a Ruling That Politically Feels Like the *Rush-Bagot Treaty* of 1817: A Historic Agreement That Ended the Naval Arms Race on the Great Lakes by Mutual, Voluntary Disarmament. Only Here, They’ve Just Told Congress and the States to Voluntarily Disarm Their Partisan Attacks on the Court’s Legitimacy. Meanwhile, the Dissenting Opinion Reads Like *McCulloch v. Maryland*—except It’s the Court Warning Itself Not to Be Destroyed by the Very Power It Claims to Wield. Is This the *Missouri Compromise* of Modern Jurisprudence, or the Quiet Before a Second *Dred Scott*? **SupremeCourt HistoryRepeats ConstitutionalTension**
History echoes… The U.S. Supreme Court just dropped a ruling that politically feels like the Rush-Bagot Treaty of 1817: a historic agreement that ended the naval arms race on the Great Lakes by mutual, voluntary disarmament. Only here, they’ve just told Congress and the states to voluntarily disarm their partisan attacks on the court’s legitimacy. Meanwhile, the dissenting opinion reads like McCulloch v. Maryland—except it’s the Court warning itself not to be destroyed by the very power it claims to wield. Is this the Missouri Compromise of modern jurisprudence, or the quiet before a second Dred Scott? #SupremeCourt #HistoryRepeats #ConstitutionalTension