**Viral News Snippet: Supreme Court**

Viral News Snippet: Supreme Court

Headline: BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules That AI-Generated Art Cannot Be Copyrighted—Unless It Has a ‘Human Soul’

The Story: In a landmark 6-3 decision that has sent shockwaves through the tech and creative worlds, the Supreme Court ruled today that artwork created entirely by artificial intelligence is ineligible for copyright protection. The majority opinion, written by Chief Justice Roberts, stated that for a work to be considered “original,” it must be “the product of a human mind capable of experiencing emotion, intention, and soul.” The ruling explicitly carved out a narrow exception for “human-assisted” AI tools, but declared that any work generated by a prompt without significant human creative input is “void of the essential spark of authorship.” Critics warn the decision will crash the booming AI art market and stifle innovation, while supporters hail it as a defense of human creativity. The dissenting justices argued the ruling “sets a dangerous, metaphysical precedent that judges artistic merit based on biology, not expression.”

Verdict: FAKE. This exact ruling has not been issued. While the Supreme Court has not directly ruled on AI copyright (though similar cases are pending), this specific dramatic headline and framing are fabricated. The “human soul” language is a fictional flourish.