**BREAKING: SCOTUS Just Dropped a Banger—Banning Vibes-Based Legislation, AITA?**

BREAKING: SCOTUS Just Dropped a Banger—Banning Vibes-Based Legislation, AITA?

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a move that has the political class absolutely seething through their ethically sourced kombucha, the Supreme Court just ruled 6-3 that “legislating based on collective feels and TikTok trends” is, in fact, unconstitutional. Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion, which literally just says, “TL;DR: The Constitution is not a vibe check.”

The case, Hashtag v. The People Who Touch Grass, originated when Congress tried to pass the “Online Safety and Aesthetics Act,” a law that made it illegal to have a bad profile picture while driving under the influence of social media outrage. Lower courts were baffled, but SCOTUS finally stepped in to clarify that “vibes” are not a protected class, and that “ratio-ing” someone is not a form of legal precedent.

Critics (who are currently ratio-ing the Court on BlueSky) are calling it the most out-of-touch decision since bread costing $4. Supporters are just posting the “W” gif from The Office.

TL;DR: Supreme Court says you can’t pass laws just because something feels “off” or “cringe.” Libs are crying. Popcorn sales up 400%. AITA for thinking this was obvious? Probably not, but let’s argue in the replies.