**Viral News Snippet:**

Viral News Snippet:

BREAKING: Solicitor General Caught Using AI to Write Supreme Court Briefs – Then Leaks Own Memo Admitting ‘I Just Prompted It’

🚨 The Claim: A whistleblower inside the Department of Justice has leaked an internal memo purportedly written by the U.S. Solicitor General, Elizabeth B. Prelogar, admitting that she used a custom AI chatbot to draft the government’s key briefs in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and SEC v. Jarkesy — two of the term’s most consequential cases.

The “Quote”:

“Frankly, I just typed ‘Write a brief arguing that Chevron deference is dead’ into the tool, and it did the heavy lifting. The justices couldn’t tell the difference. Neither could my clerks.”

The Reaction: Within hours, the leak had exploded on X (formerly Twitter), with conservative legal commentators claiming this proves the “deep state is outsourcing its legal reasoning to Silicon Valley,” while liberal law professors argue it’s a “dangerous precedent for judicial review.”

The Verification:

Is the memo real? FALSE. The Department of Justice has officially denied the existence of any such memo. A spokesperson called the leak a “crude forgery,” noting that the Solicitor General’s office does not use anyone’s custom AI, and that the alleged memo contains formatting errors inconsistent with official government documents.

Did a whistleblower come forward? PARTIALLY TRUE. An anonymous account on X with no verified background claimed to be the source. The account was created three hours before the post and has since been suspended for “coordinated inauthentic behavior.”

Could the Solicitor General legally use AI for briefs? MISLEADING. While the DOJ does use AI for document review