**AITA for Thinking the Solicitor General Is Just Reddit's Most Overworked Mod?** ⚖️🙄

AITA for thinking the Solicitor General is just Reddit’s most overworked mod? ⚖️🙄

So the U.S. Solicitor General (you know, the guy who argues for the government in front of SCOTUS) just filed a brief asking the Supreme Court to take up a case about whether you can be forced to ID yourself before voting. Big constitutional stuff, right?

TL;DR: The SG says “states can ask for ID, it’s fine.” But here’s the kicker – this is the SAME office that, like, two weeks ago was arguing that states can’t let trans kids pee in peace. 🔥

So the Supreme Court is basically getting a “Depends on who’s asking” vibe from the government’s top lawyer. The irony is so thick you could spread it on a SCOTUS justice’s morning bagel. 🥯

My hot take: The SG isn’t arguing law – they’re just collecting participation trophies from whichever political wind is blowing strongest that day. AITA for thinking the whole “rule of law” thing is just theater for normies?

Verdict from the comments: NTA. But honestly, what did you expect from a system where the final boss is a guy in a robe who didn’t get the invite to the 2020 BBQ? 🤷‍♂️

#LawTwitter #SCOTUS #SolicitorGeneral #AITA #LegalEagleButMakeItCynical