**Headline: SOLICITOR GENERAL’S “MORALITY SCORECARD” UNVEILS SECRET ‘AT-RISK’ CITIZEN LIST – Critics Warn of a New Digital Inquisition**

Headline: SOLICITOR GENERAL’S “MORALITY SCORECARD” UNVEILS SECRET ‘AT-RISK’ CITIZEN LIST – Critics Warn of a New Digital Inquisition

Byline: Cassandra Vane, Society Ethics Correspondent

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a move that has sent shockwaves through civil liberties circles, the Office of the Solicitor General has quietly launched an internal pilot program that assigns citizens a “Moral Integrity Score” based on their legal history, social media activity, and even consumer purchases.

The program, cryptically named “Project Compass,” is reportedly being used to pre-emptively flag individuals as “high-risk litigants” for future federal cases. Sources within the Department of Justice claim the score—ranging from ‘Civic Saint’ to ‘Community Menace’—determines everything from bail recommendations to the level of prosecutorial leniency offered in plea deals.

Ethicists are in an uproar, calling the system a “secularized version of the Scarlet Letter.” Professor Alistair Thorne of the Hastings Center for Moral Law described it as “the final nail in the coffin of the presumption of innocence. We are no longer judged by a jury of our peers, but by an algorithm that discounts the human capacity for redemption.”

The most controversial component? The “Involuntary Voyeurism” clause, which permits the Solicitor General’s office to subpoena book purchases, streaming service watchlists, and even charitable donation history to calculate the score. “They are quantifying virtue, which is the most dangerous form of tyranny,” Thorne added.

Opponents have dubbed the initiative the “Fall of Shame,” arguing it creates a permanent underclass of citizens deemed morally bankrupt by the state, while rewarding those who conform to a rigid, government-sanctioned definition of virtue. The Solicitor General’s